melo_annechen: (Default)
[personal profile] melo_annechen
Hmph, I took it again and found some changes.


Your overall weirdness is: 54

(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 92% of other LJers.)


Find out what your weirdness level is!


But my writing style is conventional.

Eh, I could say that "conventional=marketable" but I don't think that is what they are looking for in the analysis.

Yes, I know it's a robot, but I'm still insecure enough to have issues with the analysis. The percentages for everything else are easy to tweak once you track the variables.

Date: 2007-06-08 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
'Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is absurdly obscure.'

[tries for most obscure possible icon to go with]

Date: 2007-06-08 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annechen-melo.livejournal.com
See, [livejournal.com profile] blueeyedtigress got 100% weird, and your have an absurdly obscure writing style.

I'm not odd enough for the room. ):

Date: 2007-06-08 09:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
C'mon, Blade kinda cheated by having only one interest; as far as the other, apparently you just have to start talking about Mike Jittlov....

Date: 2007-06-08 09:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annechen-melo.livejournal.com
I don't know him well enough to talk about him!

Date: 2007-06-08 03:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] imaginarycircus.livejournal.com
Once it said I was 0% unique I rejoiced!

Personally, I'm blaming you for this

Date: 2007-06-08 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com
I decided to add "tea cosy" to my interests, in an act of civil disobedience. Or something. ::SIGH:: And by becoming more unique, I somehow lost a whole whack of weird points:

"You are... 29% unique (blame, for example, your interest in witty & multisyllabic smut) and 0% herdlike. When it comes to friends you are popular. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are keen to please. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is conventional.
Your overall weirdness is: 64
(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 94% of other LJers.)"

You're still weirder than me.

Date: 2007-06-08 06:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annechen-melo.livejournal.com
I think I know the rest of the letters in the "lgbtx rights", but what is x?

I'm imagining a lgbt meeting made up entirely of mathematical theorists.

Re: You're still weirder than me.

Date: 2007-06-08 07:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com
Oops. Heh. It's a 'q', is what it is. That should read lgbtq, as in "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Questioning".

I go fix now.

Re: You're still weirder than me.

Date: 2007-06-08 09:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
I kinda like the 'x'. Makes ya wonder more.

(Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

Date: 2007-06-08 09:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenofbeinggreen.livejournal.com
Except that, in googling to double check what the heck I was talking about, I found that in most places and usages an 'x' is apparently understood as a shortform for the Chi Rho symbol = Christian. And while I have nothing against Christian-flavoured gays, lesbians, etc., I think 'q' provides a bit more clarity .... ;]

D'oh!

Date: 2007-06-08 09:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annechen-melo.livejournal.com
You can tell I need asbestos church shoes.

Re: D'oh!

Date: 2007-06-08 09:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenofbeinggreen.livejournal.com
Corgi's right, I have seen it expressed as GLBTQX. "All clear and on green! (GLBT) QX! QX!"

Once I get my motherboard upgrade finalised, I have to download the 3rd-party software that'll allow me to log into more than one LJ IDs at a time ...... %]

Re: D'oh!

Date: 2007-06-09 04:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com
Oh, good job, that man! I was hoping someone would catch it ... ;D

Re: D'oh!

Date: 2007-06-09 06:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] cerrberus.livejournal.com
The Hymnal's in the garage with the APAs, con programs, & old pulps.
I'm not that good, just old. ;>)

Re: (Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

Date: 2007-06-08 09:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
Oh, not in-place-of, in-addition-to! Whether it's a statement of faith or a variable. I mean, it's worked terribly well for Marvel Comics, hasn't it?

Re: (Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

Date: 2007-06-08 09:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sff-corgi.livejournal.com
(And it took me an embarrassing amount of time to realise A: what your parenthetical meant to let me know B: who the blazes was speaking.)

Date: 2007-06-08 10:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnwwells.livejournal.com
You are... 0% unique and 0% herdlike. When it comes to friends you are normal. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are wary of trusting strangers. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is overcomplicated.
Your overall weirdness is: 50
(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 90% of other LJers.)

Date: 2007-06-08 10:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] johnwwells.livejournal.com
And 20% normal, 36% peculiar, 44% interesting. How on earth do they calculate these things?

Date: 2007-06-09 04:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] annechen-melo.livejournal.com
The unique and herdlike I believe are generated by your interest list, with no interests listed that are not shared by any other LJ user, you are 0% unique, and by having low-incidence interests (maybe with 100 or fewer adherents) you are not following the herd. I am not quite sure how the others factor in the equation.

Profile

melo_annechen: (Default)
melo_annechen

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16 171819202122
23242526272829
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 9th, 2025 05:47 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios