Conventional?

[melo_annechen]

Hmph, I took it again and found some changes.

Your overall weirdness is: 54

(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 92% of other LJers.)

Find out what your weirdness level is!

But my writing style is conventional.

Eh, I could say that "conventional=marketable" but I don't think that is what they are looking for in the analysis.

Yes, I know it's a robot, but I'm still insecure enough to have issues with the analysis. The percentages for everything else are easy to tweak once you track the variables.

Comments

[sff-corgi.livejournal.com]

'Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is absurdly obscure.'

[tries for most obscure possible icon to go with]

[annechen-melo.livejournal.com]

See, blueeyedtigress got 100% weird, and your have an absurdly obscure writing style.

I'm not odd enough for the room. ):

[sff-corgi.livejournal.com]

C'mon, Blade kinda cheated by having only one interest; as far as the other, apparently you just have to start talking about Mike Jittlov....

[annechen-melo.livejournal.com]

I don't know him well enough to talk about him!

[imaginarycircus.livejournal.com]

Once it said I was 0% unique I rejoiced!

Personally, I'm blaming you for this

[blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com]

I decided to add "tea cosy" to my interests, in an act of civil disobedience. Or something. ::SIGH:: And by becoming more unique, I somehow lost a whole whack of weird points:

"You are... 29% unique (blame, for example, your interest in witty & multisyllabic smut) and 0% herdlike. When it comes to friends you are popular. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are keen to please. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is conventional.
Your overall weirdness is: 64
(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 94% of other LJers.)"

You're still weirder than me.

[annechen-melo.livejournal.com]

I think I know the rest of the letters in the "lgbtx rights", but what is x?

I'm imagining a lgbt meeting made up entirely of mathematical theorists.

Re: You're still weirder than me.

[blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com]

Oops. Heh. It's a 'q', is what it is. That should read lgbtq, as in "Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgendered, and Questioning".

I go fix now.

Re: You're still weirder than me.

[sff-corgi.livejournal.com]

I kinda like the 'x'. Makes ya wonder more.

(Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

[zenofbeinggreen.livejournal.com]

Except that, in googling to double check what the heck I was talking about, I found that in most places and usages an 'x' is apparently understood as a shortform for the Chi Rho symbol = Christian. And while I have nothing against Christian-flavoured gays, lesbians, etc., I think 'q' provides a bit more clarity .... ;]

D'oh!

[annechen-melo.livejournal.com]

You can tell I need asbestos church shoes.

Re: D'oh!

[zenofbeinggreen.livejournal.com]

Corgi's right, I have seen it expressed as GLBTQX. "All clear and on green! (GLBT) QX! QX!"

Once I get my motherboard upgrade finalised, I have to download the 3rd-party software that'll allow me to log into more than one LJ IDs at a time ...... %]

Re: D'oh!

[cerrberus.livejournal.com]

Brek-ek-ek-eks

Re: D'oh!

[blueeyedtigress.livejournal.com]

Oh, good job, that man! I was hoping someone would catch it ... ;D

Re: D'oh!

[cerrberus.livejournal.com]

The Hymnal's in the garage with the APAs, con programs, & old pulps.
I'm not that good, just old. ;>)

Re: (Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

[sff-corgi.livejournal.com]

Oh, not in-place-of, in-addition-to! Whether it's a statement of faith or a variable. I mean, it's worked terribly well for Marvel Comics, hasn't it?

Re: (Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

[sff-corgi.livejournal.com]

(And it took me an embarrassing amount of time to realise A: what your parenthetical meant to let me know B: who the blazes was speaking.)

Re: (Excuse my super-suit; busy elsewhere)

[zenofbeinggreen.livejournal.com]

Hee. Sorry! ;D

[johnwwells.livejournal.com]

You are... 0% unique and 0% herdlike. When it comes to friends you are normal. In terms of the way you relate to people, you are wary of trusting strangers. Your writing style (based on a recent public entry) is overcomplicated.
Your overall weirdness is: 50
(The average level of weirdness is: 27.
You are weirder than 90% of other LJers.)

[johnwwells.livejournal.com]

And 20% normal, 36% peculiar, 44% interesting. How on earth do they calculate these things?

[annechen-melo.livejournal.com]

The unique and herdlike I believe are generated by your interest list, with no interests listed that are not shared by any other LJ user, you are 0% unique, and by having low-incidence interests (maybe with 100 or fewer adherents) you are not following the herd. I am not quite sure how the others factor in the equation.